๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ด๐น๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ป๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐?
In the book “Software Engineering at Google”, the authors describe Google’s way of measuring engineering productivity (chapter 7.). They created a team of researchers to understand different aspects of engineering productivity, from team sizes to personal developers’ productivity, based on a data-driven approach.
They decided to use the ๐๐ผ๐ฎ๐น๐/๐ฆ๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐/๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ (๐๐ฆ๐ ) ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ for metrics, where a ๐ด๐ผ๐ฎ๐น is desired end results, a ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ฎ๐น is how you might know that you’ve achieved the end results (what they would like to measure) and a ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ is a proxy for a signal (what they actually measure). Always start with the goal, then the signal, then the metric.
The research team divides productivity into five core components (called ๐ค๐จ๐๐ก๐ง๐ฆ):
๐ญ. ๐ค๐๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ: what is the quality of produced code?
๐ฎ. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฒ๐ป๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐: are engineers distracted, do they reach a flow state while they work?
๐ฏ. ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐๐: how much cognitive load is required to complete a task?
๐ฐ. ๐ง๐ฒ๐บ๐ฝ๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ผ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐: how fast can engineers finish a task?
๐ฑ. ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: how happy are engineers with their work, product, and tools?
In each of these components you can select one or more goals and based on them measure signals and get metrics. After performing research on a topic, the team at Google always prepares a ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ for how they continue to improve. They could suggest a new tool, improve the documentation process, remove some obstacles, or do anything else. What is important is that the result is actionable, if not then it’s not worth measuring.

Leave a comment