Here is an interesting article I read in the Mint newspaper.
The author argues that the assumption that the substance of a book, or a lecture, or a film is in its synopsis is one of the most foolish assumptions of our age.
It is an interesting argument. I often feel that I make this mistake of late. I look for “meaning”, “learning”, “enlightenment”, “life enriching experience” etc in everything.
Is it really needed? Always? Should there be a takeaway in everything? Should there be a purpose…always?
Worth thinking…and practising.